A Critical Analysis of Positive Psychology: Examining the Pros and Cons

Introduction:

Positive psychology has gained significant attention within the field of psychology by focusing on the study and promotion of human well-being and flourishing. The book I reference in my work with clients is The Handbook of Positive Psychology (Snyder & Lopez, 2001). The book is a comprehensive and influential resource that explores the field of positive psychology, which focuses on understanding and enhancing human well-being and flourishing. Edited by prominent psychologists C.R. Snyder and Shane J. Lopez, the handbook provides an in-depth examination of the theory, research, and practical applications of positive psychology. The handbook covers many different aspects of positive psychology. The fundamental concepts and theories that underpin the field, including topics such as positive emotions, character strengths, resilience, and optimism. The various domains of life, such as work, education, relationships, and personal development, highlighting the ways in which positive psychology can be applied to enhance these areas.

The contributors to the handbook are leading experts in their respective fields, and they provide an overview of the current state of knowledge, as well as insights into future directions for research and practice. The handbook incorporates both theoretical perspectives and empirical findings, offering a balanced and evidence-based approach to understanding the factors that contribute to human well-being. Key themes explored include positive emotions and subjective well-being, character strengths and virtues, positive relationships, positive interventions and therapies, mindfulness and positive living, and the application of positive psychology in diverse cultural contexts. It also addresses the intersection of positive psychology with other fields such as neuroscience, sociology, and economics, illustrating the interdisciplinary nature of the field.

The Handbook of Positive Psychology serves as a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and students interested in the study of human well-being and the promotion of positive functioning. Its comprehensive coverage and diverse perspectives make it an essential reference for those seeking to understand the science and application of positive psychology. While it offers valuable insights and practices to improve motivation, develop character strengths, and foster self-care, a critical analysis is necessary to understand the potential pros and cons of applying positive psychology principles. This article will explore the benefits and limitations of a positive mindset, motivation enhancement techniques, self-care practices, the development of character strengths and virtues, and the importance of aligning values, beliefs, strengths, needs, abilities, and preferences when creating a plan for health and wellness.

Resources:

What is Positive Psychology? (Positive Psychology: Blog)

Positive Psychology (Good Therapy: Learn About Therapy/Types)

Martin Seligman and the Rise of Positive Psychology (National Endowment for the Humanities)

Pros and Cons of Applying a Positive Mindset:

Developing a positive mindset has benefits and consequences. Here are some potential advantages and disadvantages to consider: Some research studies have been conducted about the pros and cons of a positive mindset, the advantages of a growth mindset, and the disadvantages of a fixed mindset. The psychology research doesn’t yet have an agreed-upon definition of positive mindset. But some researchers have proposed that positive mindset includes happiness, confidence, being in control, stability, motivation, and optimism (Barry, Folkard, & Ayliffe, 2014). Given our minds are responsible for our thoughts, emotions, and actions, it is not surprising that this definition of positive mindset is so broad. 

Benefits:

A positive mindset can improve mental well-being, increase resilience, and enhance overall life satisfaction. It fosters optimism, which can lead to more effective problem-solving and adaptive coping strategies. It promotes healthier relationships, as positive individuals tend to exhibit more prosocial behaviors and emotional intelligence. Studies have shown that people with a positive mindset are more likely to be happy and satisfied with their lives. They are also less likely to experience depression, anxiety, and other mental health problems. People with a positive mindset are more likely to succeed in school, work, and other areas of life. They are also more likely to be resilient in the face of challenges. People with a positive mindset are more likely to be creative and innovative. They are also better at solving problems.

Limitations:

An overemphasis on positivity may neglect genuine negative emotions and struggles, potentially leading to the suppression of necessary emotional processing. Constant pressure to maintain positivity may create a culture of toxic positivity, dismissing valid concerns and hindering authentic emotional expression. A positive mindset can sometimes lead to unrealistic expectations. This can be discouraging when things don’t go as planned. Some people may view a positive mindset as naive or unrealistic. This can make it difficult to connect with others who have a more negative outlook. Unrealistic optimism may lead to a lack of preparedness for potential challenges or setbacks. In some cases, a positive mindset can lead to denial of problems or challenges. This can prevent people from taking steps to address these issues.

Adopting a Growth Mindset

An article by Yeager, and Dweck, shows evidence that high quality studies, and independent analyses, have supported the conclusion that growth mindset effects are replicable, meaningful, and theoretically grounded. (Yeager & Dweck, 2020)

Advantages of a growth mindset:

People with a growth mindset are more likely to be motivated to learn and grow. They are also more likely to be resilient in the face of challenges. People with a growth mindset are more likely to succeed in school, work, and other areas of life. They are also more likely to be creative and innovative. People with a growth mindset have a stronger sense of self-confidence. They believe that they can learn and grow, which gives them the confidence to take on new challenges. (Yeager, et al, 2019)

Disadvantages of a fixed mindset:

People with a fixed mindset may be more likely to give up when they face challenges. They may believe that they are not capable of learning or growing, so they may not even try. People with a fixed mindset may be more likely to experience anxiety and perfectionism. They may be afraid of making mistakes, so they may avoid taking risks or challenging themselves. A fixed mindset can limit people’s potential. If people believe that their abilities are fixed, they may not be motivated to learn or grow. This can prevent them from reaching their full potential. (Yeager & Dweck, 2020)

Toxic positivity refers to the overgeneralization of a happy, optimistic state that results in the denial, minimization, and invalidation of the authentic human emotional experience. Upadhyay, I. S., Srivatsa, K. A., & Mamidi, R., 2022 define it as the overgeneralization of a positive state of mind that encourages using positivity to suppress and displace any acknowledgement of stress and negativity (Sokal et al., 2020; Bosveld, 2021). The popularity of the term “toxic positivity” peaked during the COVID 19 pandemic where it was used to identify advice that focused on just looking at the positive at a time when people were hurting due to loss of life, loss of jobs and other traumatic events (Upadhyay, I. S., Srivatsa, K. A., & Mamidi, R., 2022). While positivity can be beneficial, toxic positivity is problematic because it negates the full range of human emotions.

Harm that can be caused by toxic positivity includes:

1. Emotional Suppression: Toxic positivity can create a climate where expressing emotions is discouraged or even punished. This can lead to individuals suppressing their feelings and bottling up negative emotions, which can result in more significant psychological issues in the long term, such as depression and anxiety.
2. Inauthenticity: Toxic positivity can encourage people to portray an unrealistic image of themselves that aligns with a positive-only outlook. This can lead to feelings of inauthenticity and can potentially damage relationships by making them less genuine.
3. Dismissal of Genuine Feelings: By always suggesting a positive outlook, toxic positivity can lead to the dismissal of genuine feelings and experiences. It can trivialize serious issues and prevent individuals from dealing with their problems effectively.
4. Neglect of Mental Health: Individuals subjected to toxic positivity may feel pressured to mask their genuine mental health struggles, leading to lack of necessary help or treatment, and potentially exacerbating these conditions.

An article in Psychlogy Today by Mark Travers Ph.D., How to Be Positive Without Becoming Toxic: “Hang in there”? “Don’t give up”? No thanks.
Posted September 27, 2022 | Reviewed by Abigail Fagan.

Recent research into Facebook comments found several linguistic patterns that could be characterized as toxic positive language. You can be aware that toxic positivity exists, adjust expectations, and switch to a different social media website. People can minimize their use of toxic positive language by thinking about how their words come across and being authentic.

A new study published in Applied Corpus Linguistics addresses the fine line between helpful and potentially hurtful comments on social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram. Psychologist and lead author of the new research, Margo Lecompte-Van Poucke, explains her inspiration for the study: “As a social media user, I was constantly confronted with toxic positive language on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social networking services. I noticed that my Facebook posts mostly received cookie-cutter comments that were overly positive, even when I shared negative experiences.” To see whether her experience was shared by others, Lecompte-Van Poucke retrieved a total of 700+ Facebook posts and thousands of comments and replies about a rare medical condition known as endometriosis. She then studied the linguistic structure of the posts and comments, searching for evidence of toxic positivity.

As she hypothesized, Lecompte-Van Poucke found many linguistic patterns that could be characterized as toxic positive language. The symbolic pattern of “X is Y,” such as “You are an endo warrior,” “Walking is medicine,” “I am not my illness,” or “You are a fierce lioness of a woman,” was the most common of all. The next most frequent form of toxic positive language was commands such as, “hang in there,” “have faith,” or “don’t give up,” telling users what (not) to do and how (not) to behave. “The use of images like ‘warrior’ or ‘lioness’ in the online social network depict people with Invisible Chronic Conditions (ICCs) as in control of their own fate or as able to prevent their body from getting ill in the first place,” says Lecompte-Van Poucke. “This may instead come across as dismissive and distant.”

In other words, claiming that you have ‘everything you need to beat this’ in reply to a post of someone asking for support often does more harm than good. Such language may prevent people from accepting the reality of their diagnosis and can impair their ability to process the negative thoughts and emotions that come with the diagnosis of an illness.

For people grappling with an environment of toxic positivity, the author has the following recommendations:

• Be aware that there is a lot of toxic positivity on social media. This will help adjust your expectations when communicating with other users. Even though shared experiences of chronic illness may result in satisfying conversations, they may also leave you feeling disappointed and unheard.
• Switch to a different social networking site. Some platforms are more controlled and more helpful than others. Try to find a small group with competent administrators who carefully check the content that is being posted.

Furthermore, Lecompte-Van Poucke offers the following words of advice for people who wish to minimize their usage of toxic positive language, even in cases when it is accidental:

• Think before posting. Before sharing a post, comment, or reply, think carefully about how your words may come across, and write it as if the person is sitting in front of you. It is better to use phrases that start with “I am,” such as “I am sorry/sad/shocked that…” when expressing feelings of compassion.
• Be aware of hidden meanings. Phrases like “Hang in there!,” “You’ve got this!,” or “You are a warrior!” may send a signal to people that you are not interested in what they have to say.
• Be authentic. Being authentic may feel a bit risky at first. However, once you start using your own words (not auto-suggested replies, for example), communicating with others online becomes much more satisfying.

Sources: 

The Psychology of Toxic Positivity (Psychology Today)

The Problem with Toxic Positivity (The Atlantic)

Is Self-Care Woke Enough? (The New York Times)

What is ‘toxic positivity’? The harmful coping mechanism, explained. (USA Today)

How the Life Coaching Industry Harms Marginalized People (The Good Men Project)

Verywell Mind Article: Toxic Positivity

Life coaching can be a beneficial process that helps individuals make progress in their lives, achieve their goals, and improve their wellbeing. However, like any profession or service, it also has potential drawbacks.

Benefits of Life Coaching:

• Goal Clarification: A life coach can help individuals clarify their personal and professional goals, providing an outside perspective to help focus their ambitions.
• Accountability: Regular coaching sessions provide a level of accountability that can motivate individuals to take consistent action towards their goals.
• Personal Development: Life coaching often focuses on personal growth and development, including improving self-awareness, enhancing self-confidence, and developing key life skills.
• Support and Encouragement: Life coaches provide a supportive and encouraging environment to help individuals face challenges, overcome obstacles, and make significant changes in their lives.
• Tailored Approach: Life coaching is typically personalized to the needs of the individual, allowing for a more targeted and efficient approach than more generic self-help strategies.

Potential Drawbacks and Risks of Life Coaching:

Financial Barriers (Cost):

Hiring a life coach can be expensive, and not everyone has the means to afford regular sessions. This can make life coaching inaccessible to some people. Life coaching is not reimbursed by health insurance or covered by EAP services with employers.

Dependency:

There’s a risk that individuals might become overly dependent on their life coach for decision-making or validation, which can hinder their development of self-reliance and independent problem-solving skills.

Unqualified Practitioners:

Unlike regulated mental health professionals, anyone can technically become a life coach without secondary education, specific training, or professional certification. This means that there can be a wide range of quality in the services provided, with some coaches lacking the skills necessary to help their clients effectively, or even causing harm. There may be value in a person’s lived experience, but the experience of one person is difficult to generalize to a broader population in the same that rigorous scientific and academic peer reviewed studies of evidence based practice does.

Misinformation:

Some life coaches may oversimplify complex issues or offer advice outside their area of expertise. This can lead to misinformation, unrealistic expectations, and potentially harmful outcomes for clients. Life coaches can unintentionally spread misinformation in various ways, especially if they’re not adequately trained or if they stray beyond their expertise. Here are some ways this might occur:

• Overgeneralizing or Oversimplifying Complex Issues: Some life coaches might oversimplify complex life issues or personal problems, offering one-size-fits-all solutions that may not apply to everyone. They might present these simplified perspectives as definitive truths, spreading misinformation in the process.
• Offering Advice Outside Their Expertise: Life coaches might offer advice on topics outside their area of competence. For instance, providing medical or psychological advice when they don’t have the necessary training can lead to misinformation. Such advice could be inaccurate or even harmful.
• Promoting Unverified or Pseudoscientific Ideas: Some life coaches might promote unverified theories or practices, such as pseudoscientific self-help techniques. If these ideas are not grounded in reliable research or evidence, they can be misleading or even harmful.
• Lack of Continual Learning and Updating Knowledge: Like any professional, life coaches need to stay updated with relevant research and development in their field. Coaches who do not keep themselves abreast of the latest findings or trends might inadvertently spread outdated or incorrect information.

It’s important to note that not all life coaches spread misinformation. Many are diligent, well-educated, and committed to providing the best possible guidance to their clients. Clients should always do their research, seek recommendations, and check the credentials and training of any life coach they consider working with. They should also be aware that coaching is not a substitute for professional help from a licensed mental health professional, especially for serious psychological issues.

Overpromising Results:

Some life coaches might misrepresent their expertise or experience. Some life coaches may promise life-changing results to attract clients. Such promises can be misleading and harmful, setting up unrealistic expectations and potentially leading to disappointment and disillusionment. Life coaches might overpromise results in several ways, particularly those who are less scrupulous or who may lack sufficient professional training and experience. Here’s how this can happen:

• Guaranteeing Outcomes: Life coaching, like many personal development endeavors, is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Outcomes can vary greatly depending on the individual’s circumstances, effort, resources, and other factors. Coaches who guarantee specific results (like success in business, personal relationships, etc.) are overpromising, as no coach can control all variables influencing these outcomes.
• Promising Quick Results: Change often takes time, and deep-seated patterns or habits can’t typically be altered overnight. Coaches who promise fast or instant results might be overpromising. Realistic coaching programs usually involve a commitment of several weeks, months, or longer, depending on the individual’s goals and needs.
• Offering Universal Solutions: Life coaches who propose their method as a universal solution to all life’s problems are likely overpromising. Each person’s situation is unique and requires tailored approaches and strategies.
• Ignoring or Minimizing Potential Obstacles: Overpromising can also take the form of ignoring or downplaying potential challenges or obstacles. Coaches who do this are creating an unrealistic picture of the path to achieving one’s goals.
• Making Financial Claims: Some life coaches, especially in the realm of business or wealth coaching, might overpromise by guaranteeing financial success or specific income levels. While a coach can provide tools and strategies to enhance performance and productivity, guaranteeing specific financial results is not practical or ethical.

These behaviors can be harmful as they create false expectations and can lead to disappointment, demotivation, and even financial loss. It’s essential for anyone seeking a life coach to understand that progress takes time and requires personal commitment. They should also ensure that the coach they choose is professionally certified, experienced, and maintains a realistic and ethical approach to their coaching practice.

Neglecting Serious Mental Health Issues:

Life coaches are not typically equipped to handle severe mental health issues. If they don’t recognize this and refer their client to a mental health professional, they can unintentionally cause harm. While life coaching can be beneficial for many people, it is not a substitute for professional mental health services. Life coaches are not equipped to diagnose or treat mental health disorders. 

There have been several cases of life coaches being sued for telling clients to stop taking their psychiatric medications. In one case, a life coach in California was sued by a client who claimed that the life coach told her to stop taking her medication for bipolar disorder and treat her condition with supplements and diet. The client alleged that she suffered a relapse of her bipolar disorder after stopping her medication, and that the life coach’s advice was negligent and caused her harm. The case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

In another case, a life coach in New York was sued by a client who claimed that the life coach told her to stop taking her medication for depression and anxiety. The client alleged that she suffered a panic attack after stopping her medication, and that the life coach’s advice was negligent and caused her harm. The case is still pending.

These cases highlight the potential dangers of life coaches giving medical advice. Life coaches are not medical professionals, and they do not have the training or expertise to give advice about medication. If you are considering stopping your medication, it is important to talk to your doctor first.

Lack of Regulation and Oversight:

The life coaching industry is less regulated than other mental health professions. This lack of regulation can lead to unethical practices, exploitation, and harm to clients. There is a growing movement to regulate the life coach industry. Some of the organizations that are leading this movement include:

• The International Coaching Federation (ICF): The ICF is the world’s largest coaching association, and it has a set of ethical standards and education and training requirements for its members.
• The National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC): The NBCC is a professional organization for counselors, and it offers a certification for life coaches who meet its education and training requirements.
• The Association for Coaching (AC): The AC is a professional organization for coaches, and it offers a certification for life coaches who meet its education and training requirements.

These organizations are working to develop ethical standards, education and training requirements, liability insurance requirements, and licensing requirements for life coaches. However, there is no federal regulation of the life coach industry, so these requirements vary by state. As of 2023, only two states have passed laws that regulate the life coach industry:

• California: California requires life coaches to be licensed if they charge a fee for their services.
• Hawaii: Hawaii requires life coaches to be licensed if they offer services to people who are experiencing mental health challenges.

Other states are considering similar legislation, but it is not clear if or when these laws will be passed.

Conclusion:

These pros and cons emphasize the importance of carefully selecting a life coach. Look for coaches with reputable certifications, positive testimonials, and clear boundaries about their areas of expertise. If you’re dealing with serious mental health issues, it’s crucial to seek help from a licensed mental health professional. That said, not all life coaches promote toxic positivity or are unethical in their practices. Many are well-trained, ethical, and provide valuable support and guidance.

It’s essential to seek out certified, experienced life coaches and be cautious of any practitioner who dismisses negative emotions, overpromises results, or provides advice outside their expertise. If you are considering hiring a life coach, it is important to do your research and make sure that the coach you choose is qualified and ethical. You can ask the coach about their education and training, their ethical standards, and their liability insurance. You can also check with your state to see if there are any regulations that apply to life coaches in your area.

Manifesting and the Law of Attraction are concepts associated with the belief that our thoughts and intentions can influence and create our reality. The Secret is a 2006 self-help book by Rhonda Byrne, based on the earlier film of the same name. It is based on the belief of the pseudoscientific law of attraction, which claims that thoughts can change a person’s life directly. The book alleges energy as assurance of its effectiveness. The book has sold 50 million copies worldwide and has been translated into 50 languages. Scientific claims made in the book have been rejected by a range of critics, pointing out that the book has no scientific foundation (Carmichael & Radford, 2007). 

It is therefore important to acknowledge that there are potential harmful effects and limitations associated with these ideas. Here are some examples:

• Blaming the victim: The Law of Attraction suggests that individuals attract negative experiences into their lives through their own thoughts and beliefs. This can lead to victim-blaming, as it implies that people are responsible for their misfortunes. This perspective can be insensitive and fail to consider the complex factors that contribute to someone’s circumstances.
• Ignoring systemic issues: The focus on personal thoughts and intentions can divert attention away from systemic issues such as social inequality, discrimination, and structural barriers. The Law of Attraction may suggest that individuals have complete control over their circumstances, neglecting the impact of external factors beyond personal mindset.
• Oversimplification of complex problems: The Law of Attraction tends to oversimplify complex issues by suggesting that positive thinking alone can solve any problem. This can lead to a neglect of necessary action, such as seeking professional help or implementing practical solutions. Mental health issues, for instance, cannot be solely resolved through positive thinking but often require appropriate treatment and support.
• Disappointment and self-blame: When desired outcomes are not achieved, individuals who adhere strictly to manifesting or the Law of Attraction may blame themselves for not manifesting effectively or not having a positive mindset. This can result in feelings of disappointment, low self-esteem, and increased psychological distress.
• Promoting magical thinking: The emphasis on manifesting and the Law of Attraction can promote a form of magical thinking, where individuals believe that merely wishing for something will make it happen. This can lead to unrealistic expectations and a lack of understanding about the effort, time, and resources required to achieve goals.
• Overemphasis on materialistic desires: Manifesting often focuses on material wealth, success, and specific outcomes. While it is important to have goals, an overemphasis on materialistic desires can lead to a narrow perspective on happiness and fulfillment. It may also contribute to a culture of excessive consumerism and a disregard for more meaningful aspects of life.

It is important to approach manifesting and the Law of Attraction with a critical mindset, acknowledging their limitations and being aware of the broader social, economic, and environmental factors that influence our lives. Balancing personal empowerment with an understanding of the complexities of the world can lead to a more holistic and realistic approach to achieving personal goals and well-being.

Note:

• Kaufman, S. B. (2021). The opposite of toxic positivity. The Atlantic.
• Klimczak, K. S., San Miguel, G. G., Mukasa, M. N., Twohig, M. P., & Levin, M. E. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of self-guided online acceptance and commitment therapy as a transdiagnostic self-help intervention. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 52(3), 269-294.
• Krentzman, A. R., Hoeppner, B. B., Hoeppner, S. S., & Barnett, N. P. (2022). Development, feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a positive psychology journaling intervention to support addiction recovery. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1-19.
• Larkin, J. (2016, June 28). The wellness industry is a $4.2 trillion scam. Quartz.
• Margo Lecompte-Van Poucke, ‘You got this!’: A critical discourse analysis of toxic positivity as a discursive construct on Facebook, Applied Corpus Linguistics, Volume 2, Issue 1, 2022, 100015, ISSN 2666-7991, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2022.100015.(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799122000016)
• Levin, L. S., & Idler, E. L. (1983). Self-care in health. Annual review of public health, 4(1), 181-201.
• Matsuo, M. (2019). Empowerment through self-improvement skills: The role of learning goals and personal growth initiative. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103311.
• Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Ng, B. (2018). The neuroscience of growth mindset and intrinsic motivation. Brain sciences, 8(2), 20.
• Niemiec, R. M. (2014). Mindfulness and character strengths: A practical guide to flourishing. Hogrefe Publishing.
• Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603–619.
• Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
• Peterson, C., & Park, N. A. N. S. O. O. K. (2011). Character strengths and virtues: Their role in well-being. Applied positive psychology: Improving everyday life, health, schools, work, and society, 49-62.
• Pipera, M., & Fragouli, E. (2021). Employee wellbeing, employee performance & positive mindset in a crisis. The Business & Management Review, 12(2), 1-15.
• Posluns, K., & Gall, T. L. (2020). Dear mental health practitioners, take care of yourselves: A literature review on self-care. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 42, 1-20.
• Program, T. L. (2021, July 23). Rigid Expectations Effects on Mental Health. The Light Program. Retrieved from: https://www.google.com/amp/s/thelightprogram.pyramidhealthcarepa.com/rigid-expectations-impact-mental-health/amp/
• Riegel, B., Dunbar, S. B., Fitzsimons, D., Freedland, K. E., Lee, C. S., Middleton, S., … & Jaarsma, T. (2021). Self-care research: where are we now? Where are we going?. International journal of nursing studies, 116, 103402.
• Riegel, B., Westland, H., Iovino, P., Barelds, I., Slot, J. B., Stawnychy, M. A., … & Jaarsma, T. (2021). Characteristics of self-care interventions for patients with a chronic condition: A scoping review. International journal of nursing studies, 116, 103713.
• Riley, S., Evans, A., Anderson, E., & Robson, M. (2019). The gendered nature of self-help. Feminism & Psychology, 29(1), 3-18.
• Robins, J. M., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Social anxiety and the growth mindset: Implications for the classroom. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 127-132.
• Ruch, W., Gander, F., Wagner, L., & Giuliani, F. (2021). The structure of character: On the relationships between character strengths and virtues. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(1), 116-128. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2019.1689418
• Sanderson, C. A. (2019). The positive shift: Mastering mindset to improve happiness, health, and longevity. BenBella Books.
• Schneider, A. (2018, January 25). The wellness industry is a $4.5 trillion scam. The Outline.
• Seligman, M. E. (2011). Authentic happiness. Random House Australia.
• Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, S. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.
• Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford university press.
• Spiegel, D. R., Warren, A., Takakura, W., Servidio, L, & Leu, N. (2018). Disorders of diminished motivation: What they are, and how to treat them. Current Psychiatry, 17(1), 10-18, 20. Retrieved from https://www.mdedge.com/psychiatry/article/155167/depression/disorders-diminished-motivation-what-they-are-and-how-treat
• Taylor, H., Strauss, C., & Cavanagh, K. (2021). Can a little bit of mindfulness do you good? A systematic review and meta-analyses of unguided mindfulness-based self-help interventions. Clinical Psychology Review, 89, 102078.
• Upadhyay, I. S., Srivatsa, K. A., & Mamidi, R. (2022, July). Towards toxic positivity detection. In Proceedings of the tenth international workshop on natural language processing for social media (pp. 75-82).
• VandenBos, G. R. (2007). APA dictionary of psychology. American Psychological Association.
• Wong, Y. J. (2006). Strength-Centered Therapy: A social constructionist, virtues-based psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43(2), 133. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-07640-001
• Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., … & Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364-369.
• Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794
• Yu, D. S. F., De Maria, M., Barbaranelli, C., Vellone, E., Matarese, M., Ausili, D., … & Riegel, B. (2021). Cross‐cultural applicability of the Self‐Care Self‐Efficacy Scale in a multi‐national study. Journal of advanced nursing, 77(2), 681-692.